Intel Agencies Have Been Working With The Fbi For Months To Evaluate The Mar A Lago Documents

Spokesmen for the FBI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA and the National Security Agency declined to comment. For now, the risk posed by Trump storing highly classified documents at his Palm Beach, Florida resort remains purely theoretical. It is not publicly known who may have accessed or seen any of the classified materials contained in the boxes recovered by the Archives and the FBI — or what the documents themselves reveal. But current and former US officials have sounded the alarm about the potential danger of highly insecure storage of such sensitive documents, and top US lawmakers have pressed the intelligence community to clarify what it knows about the implications. There are many concerns for intelligence officials, including that secret US programs may have been exposed. There is also concern that the sensitive ways in which the US government gathers classified information – including human sources, foreign wiretapping and other technical platforms such as satellites – may have been exposed to the wrong eyes and rendered useless. Of particular concern is the potential for a human resource to be in physical danger if its identity is revealed to a rival government. Official damage assessments like the one Haines announced are designed not only to reveal any immediate damage from the exposure of classified information, but also to consider the long-term risks if that information becomes public, according to Brian Greer. a former CIA lawyer who specialized in national security investigations. For example, such a review could analyze whether there are foreign policy concerns for the US if a particular piece of classified information is disclosed. That’s different, Greer said, than the kind of case-by-case review done by the relevant business units in each agency that are geared toward immediate damage mitigation. “It makes sense to me that this has been happening since the second the FBI identified these documents,” Greer said. “These risk mitigation efforts differ from a formal assessment, which will be analytical in nature and look not only at immediate damage but also damage over the long term — it’s both concrete and theoretical.” According to Greer, there are some potential risks to conducting a full damage assessment: Specifically, that it could interfere with any criminal prosecution the Justice Department may choose to pursue as a result of its investigation. In theory, the damage assessment could be discoverable in court and risks giving the defense an opportunity for what’s known as “gray mail” — using the threat of revealing state secrets in open court to get the Justice Department to withdraw the case. Haines in her Friday notification to Congress pledged that ODNI “will coordinate closely with DOJ to ensure that this IC assessment is conducted in a manner that does not unduly interfere with DOJ’s ongoing criminal investigation.” In January, the National Archives recovered 15 boxes of presidential materials containing 184 documents marked classified, “including 67 documents marked CONFIDENTIAL, 92 documents marked SECRET, and 25 documents marked TOP SECRET,” according to a DOJ affidavit. Friday. The Justice Department sought a warrant to search Mar-a-Lago earlier this month and obtained 11 sets of classified material, including one marked “top secret/SCI” and four marked “top secret.”

title: “Intel Agencies Have Been Working With The Fbi For Months To Evaluate The Mar A Lago Documents Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-10-24” author: “Althea Cook”

Spokesmen for the FBI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA and the National Security Agency declined to comment. For now, the risk posed by Trump storing highly classified documents at his Palm Beach, Florida resort remains purely theoretical. It is not publicly known who may have accessed or seen any of the classified materials contained in the boxes recovered by the Archives and the FBI — or what the documents themselves reveal. But current and former US officials have sounded the alarm about the potential danger of highly insecure storage of such sensitive documents, and top US lawmakers have pressed the intelligence community to clarify what it knows about the implications. There are many concerns for intelligence officials, including that secret US programs may have been exposed. There is also concern that the sensitive ways in which the US government gathers classified information – including human sources, foreign wiretapping and other technical platforms such as satellites – may have been exposed to the wrong eyes and rendered useless. Of particular concern is the potential for a human resource to be in physical danger if its identity is revealed to a rival government. Official damage assessments like the one Haines announced are designed not only to reveal any immediate damage from the exposure of classified information, but also to consider the long-term risks if that information becomes public, according to Brian Greer. a former CIA lawyer who specialized in national security investigations. For example, such a review could analyze whether there are foreign policy concerns for the US if a particular piece of classified information is disclosed. That’s different, Greer said, than the kind of case-by-case review done by the relevant business units in each agency that are geared toward immediate damage mitigation. “It makes sense to me that this has been happening since the second the FBI identified these documents,” Greer said. “These risk mitigation efforts differ from a formal assessment, which will be analytical in nature and look not only at immediate damage but also damage over the long term — it’s both concrete and theoretical.” According to Greer, there are some potential risks to conducting a full damage assessment: Specifically, that it could interfere with any criminal prosecution the Justice Department may choose to pursue as a result of its investigation. In theory, the damage assessment could be discoverable in court and risks giving the defense an opportunity for what’s known as “gray mail” — using the threat of revealing state secrets in open court to get the Justice Department to withdraw the case. Haines in her Friday notification to Congress pledged that ODNI “will coordinate closely with DOJ to ensure that this IC assessment is conducted in a manner that does not unduly interfere with DOJ’s ongoing criminal investigation.” In January, the National Archives recovered 15 boxes of presidential materials containing 184 documents marked classified, “including 67 documents marked CONFIDENTIAL, 92 documents marked SECRET, and 25 documents marked TOP SECRET,” according to a DOJ affidavit. Friday. The Justice Department sought a warrant to search Mar-a-Lago earlier this month and obtained 11 sets of classified material, including one marked “top secret/SCI” and four marked “top secret.”

title: “Intel Agencies Have Been Working With The Fbi For Months To Evaluate The Mar A Lago Documents Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-10-22” author: “Jacqueline Ellis”

Spokesmen for the FBI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA and the National Security Agency declined to comment. For now, the risk posed by Trump storing highly classified documents at his Palm Beach, Florida resort remains purely theoretical. It is not publicly known who may have accessed or seen any of the classified materials contained in the boxes recovered by the Archives and the FBI — or what the documents themselves reveal. But current and former US officials have sounded the alarm about the potential danger of highly insecure storage of such sensitive documents, and top US lawmakers have pressed the intelligence community to clarify what it knows about the implications. There are many concerns for intelligence officials, including that secret US programs may have been exposed. There is also concern that the sensitive ways in which the US government gathers classified information – including human sources, foreign wiretapping and other technical platforms such as satellites – may have been exposed to the wrong eyes and rendered useless. Of particular concern is the potential for a human resource to be in physical danger if its identity is revealed to a rival government. Official damage assessments like the one Haines announced are designed not only to reveal any immediate damage from the exposure of classified information, but also to consider the long-term risks if that information becomes public, according to Brian Greer. a former CIA lawyer who specialized in national security investigations. For example, such a review could analyze whether there are foreign policy concerns for the US if a particular piece of classified information is disclosed. That’s different, Greer said, than the kind of case-by-case review done by the relevant business units in each agency that are geared toward immediate damage mitigation. “It makes sense to me that this has been happening since the second the FBI identified these documents,” Greer said. “These risk mitigation efforts differ from a formal assessment, which will be analytical in nature and look not only at immediate damage but also damage over the long term — it’s both concrete and theoretical.” According to Greer, there are some potential risks to conducting a full damage assessment: Specifically, that it could interfere with any criminal prosecution the Justice Department may choose to pursue as a result of its investigation. In theory, the damage assessment could be discoverable in court and risks giving the defense an opportunity for what’s known as “gray mail” — using the threat of revealing state secrets in open court to get the Justice Department to withdraw the case. Haines in her Friday notification to Congress pledged that ODNI “will coordinate closely with DOJ to ensure that this IC assessment is conducted in a manner that does not unduly interfere with DOJ’s ongoing criminal investigation.” In January, the National Archives recovered 15 boxes of presidential materials containing 184 documents marked classified, “including 67 documents marked CONFIDENTIAL, 92 documents marked SECRET, and 25 documents marked TOP SECRET,” according to a DOJ affidavit. Friday. The Justice Department sought a warrant to search Mar-a-Lago earlier this month and obtained 11 sets of classified material, including one marked “top secret/SCI” and four marked “top secret.”

title: “Intel Agencies Have Been Working With The Fbi For Months To Evaluate The Mar A Lago Documents Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-24” author: “Anna Williams”

Spokesmen for the FBI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA and the National Security Agency declined to comment. For now, the risk posed by Trump storing highly classified documents at his Palm Beach, Florida resort remains purely theoretical. It is not publicly known who may have accessed or seen any of the classified materials contained in the boxes recovered by the Archives and the FBI — or what the documents themselves reveal. But current and former US officials have sounded the alarm about the potential danger of highly insecure storage of such sensitive documents, and top US lawmakers have pressed the intelligence community to clarify what it knows about the implications. There are many concerns for intelligence officials, including that secret US programs may have been exposed. There is also concern that the sensitive ways in which the US government gathers classified information – including human sources, foreign wiretapping and other technical platforms such as satellites – may have been exposed to the wrong eyes and rendered useless. Of particular concern is the potential for a human resource to be in physical danger if its identity is revealed to a rival government. Official damage assessments like the one Haines announced are designed not only to reveal any immediate damage from the exposure of classified information, but also to consider the long-term risks if that information becomes public, according to Brian Greer. a former CIA lawyer who specialized in national security investigations. For example, such a review could analyze whether there are foreign policy concerns for the US if a particular piece of classified information is disclosed. That’s different, Greer said, than the kind of case-by-case review done by the relevant business units in each agency that are geared toward immediate damage mitigation. “It makes sense to me that this has been happening since the second the FBI identified these documents,” Greer said. “These risk mitigation efforts differ from a formal assessment, which will be analytical in nature and look not only at immediate damage but also damage over the long term — it’s both concrete and theoretical.” According to Greer, there are some potential risks to conducting a full damage assessment: Specifically, that it could interfere with any criminal prosecution the Justice Department may choose to pursue as a result of its investigation. In theory, the damage assessment could be discoverable in court and risks giving the defense an opportunity for what’s known as “gray mail” — using the threat of revealing state secrets in open court to get the Justice Department to withdraw the case. Haines in her Friday notification to Congress pledged that ODNI “will coordinate closely with DOJ to ensure that this IC assessment is conducted in a manner that does not unduly interfere with DOJ’s ongoing criminal investigation.” In January, the National Archives recovered 15 boxes of presidential materials containing 184 documents marked classified, “including 67 documents marked CONFIDENTIAL, 92 documents marked SECRET, and 25 documents marked TOP SECRET,” according to a DOJ affidavit. Friday. The Justice Department sought a warrant to search Mar-a-Lago earlier this month and obtained 11 sets of classified material, including one marked “top secret/SCI” and four marked “top secret.”

title: “Intel Agencies Have Been Working With The Fbi For Months To Evaluate The Mar A Lago Documents Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-23” author: “Crystal Shumay”

Spokesmen for the FBI, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA and the National Security Agency declined to comment. For now, the risk posed by Trump storing highly classified documents at his Palm Beach, Florida resort remains purely theoretical. It is not publicly known who may have accessed or seen any of the classified materials contained in the boxes recovered by the Archives and the FBI — or what the documents themselves reveal. But current and former US officials have sounded the alarm about the potential danger of highly insecure storage of such sensitive documents, and top US lawmakers have pressed the intelligence community to clarify what it knows about the implications. There are many concerns for intelligence officials, including that secret US programs may have been exposed. There is also concern that the sensitive ways in which the US government gathers classified information – including human sources, foreign wiretapping and other technical platforms such as satellites – may have been exposed to the wrong eyes and rendered useless. Of particular concern is the potential for a human resource to be in physical danger if its identity is revealed to a rival government. Official damage assessments like the one Haines announced are designed not only to reveal any immediate damage from the exposure of classified information, but also to consider the long-term risks if that information becomes public, according to Brian Greer. a former CIA lawyer who specialized in national security investigations. For example, such a review could analyze whether there are foreign policy concerns for the US if a particular piece of classified information is disclosed. That’s different, Greer said, than the kind of case-by-case review done by the relevant business units in each agency that are geared toward immediate damage mitigation. “It makes sense to me that this has been happening since the second the FBI identified these documents,” Greer said. “These risk mitigation efforts differ from a formal assessment, which will be analytical in nature and look not only at immediate damage but also damage over the long term — it’s both concrete and theoretical.” According to Greer, there are some potential risks to conducting a full damage assessment: Specifically, that it could interfere with any criminal prosecution the Justice Department may choose to pursue as a result of its investigation. In theory, the damage assessment could be discoverable in court and risks giving the defense an opportunity for what’s known as “gray mail” — using the threat of revealing state secrets in open court to get the Justice Department to withdraw the case. Haines in her Friday notification to Congress pledged that ODNI “will coordinate closely with DOJ to ensure that this IC assessment is conducted in a manner that does not unduly interfere with DOJ’s ongoing criminal investigation.” In January, the National Archives recovered 15 boxes of presidential materials containing 184 documents marked classified, “including 67 documents marked CONFIDENTIAL, 92 documents marked SECRET, and 25 documents marked TOP SECRET,” according to a DOJ affidavit. Friday. The Justice Department sought a warrant to search Mar-a-Lago earlier this month and obtained 11 sets of classified material, including one marked “top secret/SCI” and four marked “top secret.”