Doj Would Wait Until Midterms To Charge Trump Report

If federal prosecutors decide to charge former President Donald Trump with a crime, they will wait until after the midterm elections in November to do so, Bloomberg reported, citing people familiar with the matter. The Justice Department is currently investigating whether Trump violated three federal laws, including the Espionage Act, when he improperly moved government records to Mar-a-Lago after leaving office and resisted turning them over for more than a year afterward . Prosecutors are also said to be targeting Trump as part of a separate, ongoing investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on Capitol Hill and the events surrounding it. Under longstanding department policy, prosecutors are prohibited from taking overt investigative steps within 60 days of an election that could affect the outcome of a race or race. That said, it’s unlikely that prosecutors would have brought charges against Trump before the midterms, even if department policy didn’t prohibit it. Earlier this month, a top counterintelligence official at the DOJ told a federal judge that the investigation into Trump’s handling of government documents is still in its preliminary stages. The official, Jay Bratt, made the comment at a hearing where Judge Bruce Reinhart weighed the unsealing of the FBI affidavit that formed the basis for the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago. Rinehart later decided to unseal a redacted version of the affidavit to protect the identities of witnesses, sources and methods, as well as sensitive juror information. Bloomberg’s report came a day after Attorney General Merrick Garland introduced new restrictions on employee political activities to “maintain public trust and ensure that politics — both in fact and in appearance — does not compromise or affect the integrity of of our work”. Trump’s handling of sensitive government records came under the spotlight after the FBI searched his Mar-a-Lago, Florida estate on August 8 and seized more than two dozen boxes of documents, some of which were classified as top secret. . In the weeks since, Trump has accused the Justice Department and the FBI of violating his rights and filed a lawsuit last week asking a court-appointed “special master” to sift through the seized materials and filter out what was privileged. The Justice Department filed its response to the lawsuit late Tuesday, saying Trump is not entitled to a special master because the records contained in the boxes “do not belong to him” and are the property of the US government. In the days following the Mar-a-Lago investigation, former federal prosecutors said it was possible Trump would not be charged with any crime and that the administration’s top priority may have been recovering documents improperly stored at his Florida residence , because of their sensitivity. But in Tuesday’s filing, the Justice Department said it had gathered evidence of “possible” efforts to obstruct its investigation into Trump’s handling of government records. That detail, legal experts said, could change the calculus of prosecutors as they weigh the unprecedented step of indicting a former US president. The former president, for his part, spent much of Wednesday recycling allegations of political bias and prosecutorial misconduct on his Truth Social account. “Horrible how the FBI, during the Mar-a-Lago raid, randomly threw documents all over the floor (perhaps pretending I was the one doing it!) and then started photographing them to see the public”. he wrote in a post. “Did they think they wanted to keep it a secret? Lucky me I was disqualified!”

title: “Doj Would Wait Until Midterms To Charge Trump Report Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-10-26” author: “Sondra Coach”

If federal prosecutors decide to charge former President Donald Trump with a crime, they will wait until after the midterm elections in November to do so, Bloomberg reported, citing people familiar with the matter. The Justice Department is currently investigating whether Trump violated three federal laws, including the Espionage Act, when he improperly moved government records to Mar-a-Lago after leaving office and resisted turning them over for more than a year afterward . Prosecutors are also said to be targeting Trump as part of a separate, ongoing investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on Capitol Hill and the events surrounding it. Under longstanding department policy, prosecutors are prohibited from taking overt investigative steps within 60 days of an election that could affect the outcome of a race or race. That said, it’s unlikely that prosecutors would have brought charges against Trump before the midterms, even if department policy didn’t prohibit it. Earlier this month, a top counterintelligence official at the DOJ told a federal judge that the investigation into Trump’s handling of government documents is still in its preliminary stages. The official, Jay Bratt, made the comment at a hearing where Judge Bruce Reinhart weighed the unsealing of the FBI affidavit that formed the basis for the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago. Rinehart later decided to unseal a redacted version of the affidavit to protect the identities of witnesses, sources and methods, as well as sensitive juror information. Bloomberg’s report came a day after Attorney General Merrick Garland introduced new restrictions on employee political activities to “maintain public trust and ensure that politics — both in fact and in appearance — does not compromise or affect the integrity of of our work”. Trump’s handling of sensitive government records came under the spotlight after the FBI searched his Mar-a-Lago, Florida estate on August 8 and seized more than two dozen boxes of documents, some of which were classified as top secret. . In the weeks since, Trump has accused the Justice Department and the FBI of violating his rights and filed a lawsuit last week asking a court-appointed “special master” to sift through the seized materials and filter out what was privileged. The Justice Department filed its response to the lawsuit late Tuesday, saying Trump is not entitled to a special master because the records contained in the boxes “do not belong to him” and are the property of the US government. In the days following the Mar-a-Lago investigation, former federal prosecutors said it was possible Trump would not be charged with any crime and that the administration’s top priority may have been recovering documents improperly stored at his Florida residence , because of their sensitivity. But in Tuesday’s filing, the Justice Department said it had gathered evidence of “possible” efforts to obstruct its investigation into Trump’s handling of government records. That detail, legal experts said, could change the calculus of prosecutors as they weigh the unprecedented step of indicting a former US president. The former president, for his part, spent much of Wednesday recycling allegations of political bias and prosecutorial misconduct on his Truth Social account. “Horrible how the FBI, during the Mar-a-Lago raid, randomly threw documents all over the floor (perhaps pretending I was the one doing it!) and then started photographing them to see the public”. he wrote in a post. “Did they think they wanted to keep it a secret? Lucky me I was disqualified!”

title: “Doj Would Wait Until Midterms To Charge Trump Report Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-17” author: “Linda Conder”

If federal prosecutors decide to charge former President Donald Trump with a crime, they will wait until after the midterm elections in November to do so, Bloomberg reported, citing people familiar with the matter. The Justice Department is currently investigating whether Trump violated three federal laws, including the Espionage Act, when he improperly moved government records to Mar-a-Lago after leaving office and resisted turning them over for more than a year afterward . Prosecutors are also said to be targeting Trump as part of a separate, ongoing investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on Capitol Hill and the events surrounding it. Under longstanding department policy, prosecutors are prohibited from taking overt investigative steps within 60 days of an election that could affect the outcome of a race or race. That said, it’s unlikely that prosecutors would have brought charges against Trump before the midterms, even if department policy didn’t prohibit it. Earlier this month, a top counterintelligence official at the DOJ told a federal judge that the investigation into Trump’s handling of government documents is still in its preliminary stages. The official, Jay Bratt, made the comment at a hearing where Judge Bruce Reinhart weighed the unsealing of the FBI affidavit that formed the basis for the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago. Rinehart later decided to unseal a redacted version of the affidavit to protect the identities of witnesses, sources and methods, as well as sensitive juror information. Bloomberg’s report came a day after Attorney General Merrick Garland introduced new restrictions on employee political activities to “maintain public trust and ensure that politics — both in fact and in appearance — does not compromise or affect the integrity of of our work”. Trump’s handling of sensitive government records came under the spotlight after the FBI searched his Mar-a-Lago, Florida estate on August 8 and seized more than two dozen boxes of documents, some of which were classified as top secret. . In the weeks since, Trump has accused the Justice Department and the FBI of violating his rights and filed a lawsuit last week asking a court-appointed “special master” to sift through the seized materials and filter out what was privileged. The Justice Department filed its response to the lawsuit late Tuesday, saying Trump is not entitled to a special master because the records contained in the boxes “do not belong to him” and are the property of the US government. In the days following the Mar-a-Lago investigation, former federal prosecutors said it was possible Trump would not be charged with any crime and that the administration’s top priority may have been recovering documents improperly stored at his Florida residence , because of their sensitivity. But in Tuesday’s filing, the Justice Department said it had gathered evidence of “possible” efforts to obstruct its investigation into Trump’s handling of government records. That detail, legal experts said, could change the calculus of prosecutors as they weigh the unprecedented step of indicting a former US president. The former president, for his part, spent much of Wednesday recycling allegations of political bias and prosecutorial misconduct on his Truth Social account. “Horrible how the FBI, during the Mar-a-Lago raid, randomly threw documents all over the floor (perhaps pretending I was the one doing it!) and then started photographing them to see the public”. he wrote in a post. “Did they think they wanted to keep it a secret? Lucky me I was disqualified!”

title: “Doj Would Wait Until Midterms To Charge Trump Report Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-27” author: “Geneva Vix”

If federal prosecutors decide to charge former President Donald Trump with a crime, they will wait until after the midterm elections in November to do so, Bloomberg reported, citing people familiar with the matter. The Justice Department is currently investigating whether Trump violated three federal laws, including the Espionage Act, when he improperly moved government records to Mar-a-Lago after leaving office and resisted turning them over for more than a year afterward . Prosecutors are also said to be targeting Trump as part of a separate, ongoing investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on Capitol Hill and the events surrounding it. Under longstanding department policy, prosecutors are prohibited from taking overt investigative steps within 60 days of an election that could affect the outcome of a race or race. That said, it’s unlikely that prosecutors would have brought charges against Trump before the midterms, even if department policy didn’t prohibit it. Earlier this month, a top counterintelligence official at the DOJ told a federal judge that the investigation into Trump’s handling of government documents is still in its preliminary stages. The official, Jay Bratt, made the comment at a hearing where Judge Bruce Reinhart weighed the unsealing of the FBI affidavit that formed the basis for the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago. Rinehart later decided to unseal a redacted version of the affidavit to protect the identities of witnesses, sources and methods, as well as sensitive juror information. Bloomberg’s report came a day after Attorney General Merrick Garland introduced new restrictions on employee political activities to “maintain public trust and ensure that politics — both in fact and in appearance — does not compromise or affect the integrity of of our work”. Trump’s handling of sensitive government records came under the spotlight after the FBI searched his Mar-a-Lago, Florida estate on August 8 and seized more than two dozen boxes of documents, some of which were classified as top secret. . In the weeks since, Trump has accused the Justice Department and the FBI of violating his rights and filed a lawsuit last week asking a court-appointed “special master” to sift through the seized materials and filter out what was privileged. The Justice Department filed its response to the lawsuit late Tuesday, saying Trump is not entitled to a special master because the records contained in the boxes “do not belong to him” and are the property of the US government. In the days following the Mar-a-Lago investigation, former federal prosecutors said it was possible Trump would not be charged with any crime and that the administration’s top priority may have been recovering documents improperly stored at his Florida residence , because of their sensitivity. But in Tuesday’s filing, the Justice Department said it had gathered evidence of “possible” efforts to obstruct its investigation into Trump’s handling of government records. That detail, legal experts said, could change the calculus of prosecutors as they weigh the unprecedented step of indicting a former US president. The former president, for his part, spent much of Wednesday recycling allegations of political bias and prosecutorial misconduct on his Truth Social account. “Horrible how the FBI, during the Mar-a-Lago raid, randomly threw documents all over the floor (perhaps pretending I was the one doing it!) and then started photographing them to see the public”. he wrote in a post. “Did they think they wanted to keep it a secret? Lucky me I was disqualified!”