The posting of Mr Giggs’ now business partner was brought before the judge on the third morning of the trial, with proceedings scheduled to start just six hours later. Judge Hilary Manley has now referred the matter to the Attorney General. That followed a jury being discharged on Wednesday after it failed to reach a verdict on the 17th day of the trial. A source close to Neville told the Telegraph he denied the claim. They said the post was in response to Manchester United’s owners – the Glazer family – and fans demonstrating in protest at the way the football club is run. By the time the judge was made aware of the post, thousands of people had already liked it, including Melanie Sykes, the TV presenter, who also reacted with a heart emoji.
The press brought the post to the attention of the lawyers
A member of the press brought this to the attention of the lawyers in the case, who in turn sent the image to Judge Manley. He said: “Having considered the law and possible contempt, I have brought the matter and this particular position to the attention of the circuit president.” The judge said she was not aware that any member of the jury had seen the post and was therefore happy for the trial to go ahead. But the post was sent before instructing jurors not to view anything online about the case. On the morning of the third day, Kate Greville, Mr Giggs’ ex-girlfriend, was in the witness stand and Peter Wright QC for the Crown said: “It is not known whether he has seen it at all, but in the context of evidence that has already given in this case, this is a matter to which we may seek to return in due course.’ Chris Daw QC, defending, said: “Your honour, in terms of any potential implication – we make it clear that Mr Giggs was not aware of it.” He said there was a secondary concern because of the nature of social media, a juror could stumble upon the post without looking for it because it would appear in their feed if they were following Mr Neville.
title: “Gary Neville Cited For Possible Contempt Of Court Over Social Media Post Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-18” author: “Ronald Rogers”
The posting of Mr Giggs’ now business partner was brought before the judge on the third morning of the trial, with proceedings scheduled to start just six hours later. Judge Hilary Manley has now referred the matter to the Attorney General. That followed a jury being discharged on Wednesday after it failed to reach a verdict on the 17th day of the trial. A source close to Neville told the Telegraph he denied the claim. They said the post was in response to Manchester United’s owners – the Glazer family – and fans demonstrating in protest at the way the football club is run. By the time the judge was made aware of the post, thousands of people had already liked it, including Melanie Sykes, the TV presenter, who also reacted with a heart emoji.
The press brought the post to the attention of the lawyers
A member of the press brought this to the attention of the lawyers in the case, who in turn sent the image to Judge Manley. He said: “Having considered the law and possible contempt, I have brought the matter and this particular position to the attention of the circuit president.” The judge said she was not aware that any member of the jury had seen the post and was therefore happy for the trial to go ahead. But the post was sent before instructing jurors not to view anything online about the case. On the morning of the third day, Kate Greville, Mr Giggs’ ex-girlfriend, was in the witness stand and Peter Wright QC for the Crown said: “It is not known whether he has seen it at all, but in the context of evidence that has already given in this case, this is a matter to which we may seek to return in due course.’ Chris Daw QC, defending, said: “Your honour, in terms of any potential implication – we make it clear that Mr Giggs was not aware of it.” He said there was a secondary concern because of the nature of social media, a juror could stumble upon the post without looking for it because it would appear in their feed if they were following Mr Neville.
title: “Gary Neville Cited For Possible Contempt Of Court Over Social Media Post Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-28” author: “William Paez”
The posting of Mr Giggs’ now business partner was brought before the judge on the third morning of the trial, with proceedings scheduled to start just six hours later. Judge Hilary Manley has now referred the matter to the Attorney General. That followed a jury being discharged on Wednesday after it failed to reach a verdict on the 17th day of the trial. A source close to Neville told the Telegraph he denied the claim. They said the post was in response to Manchester United’s owners – the Glazer family – and fans demonstrating in protest at the way the football club is run. By the time the judge was made aware of the post, thousands of people had already liked it, including Melanie Sykes, the TV presenter, who also reacted with a heart emoji.
The press brought the post to the attention of the lawyers
A member of the press brought this to the attention of the lawyers in the case, who in turn sent the image to Judge Manley. He said: “Having considered the law and possible contempt, I have brought the matter and this particular position to the attention of the circuit president.” The judge said she was not aware that any member of the jury had seen the post and was therefore happy for the trial to go ahead. But the post was sent before instructing jurors not to view anything online about the case. On the morning of the third day, Kate Greville, Mr Giggs’ ex-girlfriend, was in the witness stand and Peter Wright QC for the Crown said: “It is not known whether he has seen it at all, but in the context of evidence that has already given in this case, this is a matter to which we may seek to return in due course.’ Chris Daw QC, defending, said: “Your honour, in terms of any potential implication – we make it clear that Mr Giggs was not aware of it.” He said there was a secondary concern because of the nature of social media, a juror could stumble upon the post without looking for it because it would appear in their feed if they were following Mr Neville.
title: “Gary Neville Cited For Possible Contempt Of Court Over Social Media Post Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-12-19” author: “Herman Mannino”
The posting of Mr Giggs’ now business partner was brought before the judge on the third morning of the trial, with proceedings scheduled to start just six hours later. Judge Hilary Manley has now referred the matter to the Attorney General. That followed a jury being discharged on Wednesday after it failed to reach a verdict on the 17th day of the trial. A source close to Neville told the Telegraph he denied the claim. They said the post was in response to Manchester United’s owners – the Glazer family – and fans demonstrating in protest at the way the football club is run. By the time the judge was made aware of the post, thousands of people had already liked it, including Melanie Sykes, the TV presenter, who also reacted with a heart emoji.
The press brought the post to the attention of the lawyers
A member of the press brought this to the attention of the lawyers in the case, who in turn sent the image to Judge Manley. He said: “Having considered the law and possible contempt, I have brought the matter and this particular position to the attention of the circuit president.” The judge said she was not aware that any member of the jury had seen the post and was therefore happy for the trial to go ahead. But the post was sent before instructing jurors not to view anything online about the case. On the morning of the third day, Kate Greville, Mr Giggs’ ex-girlfriend, was in the witness stand and Peter Wright QC for the Crown said: “It is not known whether he has seen it at all, but in the context of evidence that has already given in this case, this is a matter to which we may seek to return in due course.’ Chris Daw QC, defending, said: “Your honour, in terms of any potential implication – we make it clear that Mr Giggs was not aware of it.” He said there was a secondary concern because of the nature of social media, a juror could stumble upon the post without looking for it because it would appear in their feed if they were following Mr Neville.
