Trump S New Legal Document Reads Like A Pr File Experts Say

Former President Donald Trump’s legal team in a new court filing Wednesday recycled allegations of political bias against the Justice Department. referred to his possible 2024 presidential run; and argued that Trump has the right to sue the Justice Department and seek a court-appointed “special master” in the wake of the FBI’s investigation of his Mar-a-Lago estate. “Three weeks after an unprecedented, unnecessary and legally unwarranted raid on the home of a President — and possibly a candidate against the current CEO in 2024 — the administration, represented by the Department of Justice … and the Office of the United States Attorney States , has filed an emergency brief with the Court, suggesting that the DOJ, and the DOJ alone, should be charged with the responsibility of evaluating its unjustified pursuit of criminalizing a former President’s possession of personal and presidential records in a secure environment. reading. He also disputed the Justice Department’s earlier contention that Trump lacked standing to file suit against the US, saying “it is the reasonable expectation of privacy in the home that gives rise to the owner’s apparent standing to challenge the search of these facilities. “ But within minutes of the court documents being filed, national security experts and former prosecutors pointed out that, like Trump’s original lawsuit, it sounded more like a press release than a legal document. First, as former federal prosecutor Harry Littman wrote, Trump would have standing — or the right to sue — but only if he is charged and “can’t do it in advance.” And Andrew Weissmann, a former FBI general counsel who later worked in special counsel Robert Mueller’s office, also noted that contrary to the Trump team’s claim that the Justice Department was “criminalizing” him, only a grand jury could indict him. “This is how our justice system works,” Weissmann wrote. “This is another PR filing, not a serious one.” Notably, Trump’s team made no mention in Wednesday’s testimony of his weeks-long claim that he had largely declassified all materials seized from Mar-a-Lago, a claim he made on Truth Social just this morning of Wednesday. He also did not address the Justice Department’s most damning claim, made in court testimony Tuesday night: that it had evidence of “possible” efforts to obstruct its investigation into Trump’s handling of national security information. Trump first filed suit last week asking a court-appointed “special master” — usually a former judge — to sift through materials seized in the search and filter out what might be privileged. But the Justice Department said in its response Tuesday that Trump is not entitled to a special master because the files in question “do not belong to him.” The FBI discovered more than two dozen boxes of government records, some of which were classified as top secret, after executing a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago earlier this month. That’s in addition to the 15 boxes of documents Trump turned over in January in response to a request from the National Archives. The department also presented the most detailed description of investigators’ suspicions that Trump and his team misled them when they claimed in a June 3 letter that they had returned all classified files stored at Mar-a-Lago to the government after “diligent research.” The FBI “recovered twice as many redacted documents from the “diligent investigation” that Trump’s lawyer and other representatives “had weeks” to conduct, the Justice Department said in its response to Trump’s lawsuit. This “calls into serious question the statements made in the June 3 certification and calls into question the extent of cooperation in this matter.” Tuesday’s filing by the Justice Department was “devastating and deserved a serious, accurate response,” wrote longtime former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti. But Trump’s response was “large on hyperbole and lacking in law” and appeared to skip over “the most damning details.”

title: “Trump S New Legal Document Reads Like A Pr File Experts Say Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-16” author: “Ruth Chaney”

Former President Donald Trump’s legal team in a new court filing Wednesday recycled allegations of political bias against the Justice Department. referred to his possible 2024 presidential run; and argued that Trump has the right to sue the Justice Department and seek a court-appointed “special master” in the wake of the FBI’s investigation of his Mar-a-Lago estate. “Three weeks after an unprecedented, unnecessary and legally unwarranted raid on the home of a President — and possibly a candidate against the current CEO in 2024 — the administration, represented by the Department of Justice … and the Office of the United States Attorney States , has filed an emergency brief with the Court, suggesting that the DOJ, and the DOJ alone, should be charged with the responsibility of evaluating its unjustified pursuit of criminalizing a former President’s possession of personal and presidential records in a secure environment. reading. He also disputed the Justice Department’s earlier contention that Trump lacked standing to file suit against the US, saying “it is the reasonable expectation of privacy in the home that gives rise to the owner’s apparent standing to challenge the search of these facilities. “ But within minutes of the court documents being filed, national security experts and former prosecutors pointed out that, like Trump’s original lawsuit, it sounded more like a press release than a legal document. First, as former federal prosecutor Harry Littman wrote, Trump would have standing — or the right to sue — but only if he is charged and “can’t do it in advance.” And Andrew Weissmann, a former FBI general counsel who later worked in special counsel Robert Mueller’s office, also noted that contrary to the Trump team’s claim that the Justice Department was “criminalizing” him, only a grand jury could indict him. “This is how our justice system works,” Weissmann wrote. “This is another PR filing, not a serious one.” Notably, Trump’s team made no mention in Wednesday’s testimony of his weeks-long claim that he had largely declassified all materials seized from Mar-a-Lago, a claim he made on Truth Social just this morning of Wednesday. He also did not address the Justice Department’s most damning claim, made in court testimony Tuesday night: that it had evidence of “possible” efforts to obstruct its investigation into Trump’s handling of national security information. Trump first filed suit last week asking a court-appointed “special master” — usually a former judge — to sift through materials seized in the search and filter out what might be privileged. But the Justice Department said in its response Tuesday that Trump is not entitled to a special master because the files in question “do not belong to him.” The FBI discovered more than two dozen boxes of government records, some of which were classified as top secret, after executing a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago earlier this month. That’s in addition to the 15 boxes of documents Trump turned over in January in response to a request from the National Archives. The department also presented the most detailed description of investigators’ suspicions that Trump and his team misled them when they claimed in a June 3 letter that they had returned all classified files stored at Mar-a-Lago to the government after “diligent research.” The FBI “recovered twice as many redacted documents from the “diligent investigation” that Trump’s lawyer and other representatives “had weeks” to conduct, the Justice Department said in its response to Trump’s lawsuit. This “calls into serious question the statements made in the June 3 certification and calls into question the extent of cooperation in this matter.” Tuesday’s filing by the Justice Department was “devastating and deserved a serious, accurate response,” wrote longtime former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti. But Trump’s response was “large on hyperbole and lacking in law” and appeared to skip over “the most damning details.”

title: “Trump S New Legal Document Reads Like A Pr File Experts Say Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-07” author: “Ryan Hornak”

Former President Donald Trump’s legal team in a new court filing Wednesday recycled allegations of political bias against the Justice Department. referred to his possible 2024 presidential run; and argued that Trump has the right to sue the Justice Department and seek a court-appointed “special master” in the wake of the FBI’s investigation of his Mar-a-Lago estate. “Three weeks after an unprecedented, unnecessary and legally unwarranted raid on the home of a President — and possibly a candidate against the current CEO in 2024 — the administration, represented by the Department of Justice … and the Office of the United States Attorney States , has filed an emergency brief with the Court, suggesting that the DOJ, and the DOJ alone, should be charged with the responsibility of evaluating its unjustified pursuit of criminalizing a former President’s possession of personal and presidential records in a secure environment. reading. He also disputed the Justice Department’s earlier contention that Trump lacked standing to file suit against the US, saying “it is the reasonable expectation of privacy in the home that gives rise to the owner’s apparent standing to challenge the search of these facilities. “ But within minutes of the court documents being filed, national security experts and former prosecutors pointed out that, like Trump’s original lawsuit, it sounded more like a press release than a legal document. First, as former federal prosecutor Harry Littman wrote, Trump would have standing — or the right to sue — but only if he is charged and “can’t do it in advance.” And Andrew Weissmann, a former FBI general counsel who later worked in special counsel Robert Mueller’s office, also noted that contrary to the Trump team’s claim that the Justice Department was “criminalizing” him, only a grand jury could indict him. “This is how our justice system works,” Weissmann wrote. “This is another PR filing, not a serious one.” Notably, Trump’s team made no mention in Wednesday’s testimony of his weeks-long claim that he had largely declassified all materials seized from Mar-a-Lago, a claim he made on Truth Social just this morning of Wednesday. He also did not address the Justice Department’s most damning claim, made in court testimony Tuesday night: that it had evidence of “possible” efforts to obstruct its investigation into Trump’s handling of national security information. Trump first filed suit last week asking a court-appointed “special master” — usually a former judge — to sift through materials seized in the search and filter out what might be privileged. But the Justice Department said in its response Tuesday that Trump is not entitled to a special master because the files in question “do not belong to him.” The FBI discovered more than two dozen boxes of government records, some of which were classified as top secret, after executing a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago earlier this month. That’s in addition to the 15 boxes of documents Trump turned over in January in response to a request from the National Archives. The department also presented the most detailed description of investigators’ suspicions that Trump and his team misled them when they claimed in a June 3 letter that they had returned all classified files stored at Mar-a-Lago to the government after “diligent research.” The FBI “recovered twice as many redacted documents from the “diligent investigation” that Trump’s lawyer and other representatives “had weeks” to conduct, the Justice Department said in its response to Trump’s lawsuit. This “calls into serious question the statements made in the June 3 certification and calls into question the extent of cooperation in this matter.” Tuesday’s filing by the Justice Department was “devastating and deserved a serious, accurate response,” wrote longtime former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti. But Trump’s response was “large on hyperbole and lacking in law” and appeared to skip over “the most damning details.”

title: “Trump S New Legal Document Reads Like A Pr File Experts Say Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-27” author: “Mindy Jackson”

Former President Donald Trump’s legal team in a new court filing Wednesday recycled allegations of political bias against the Justice Department. referred to his possible 2024 presidential run; and argued that Trump has the right to sue the Justice Department and seek a court-appointed “special master” in the wake of the FBI’s investigation of his Mar-a-Lago estate. “Three weeks after an unprecedented, unnecessary and legally unwarranted raid on the home of a President — and possibly a candidate against the current CEO in 2024 — the administration, represented by the Department of Justice … and the Office of the United States Attorney States , has filed an emergency brief with the Court, suggesting that the DOJ, and the DOJ alone, should be charged with the responsibility of evaluating its unjustified pursuit of criminalizing a former President’s possession of personal and presidential records in a secure environment. reading. He also disputed the Justice Department’s earlier contention that Trump lacked standing to file suit against the US, saying “it is the reasonable expectation of privacy in the home that gives rise to the owner’s apparent standing to challenge the search of these facilities. “ But within minutes of the court documents being filed, national security experts and former prosecutors pointed out that, like Trump’s original lawsuit, it sounded more like a press release than a legal document. First, as former federal prosecutor Harry Littman wrote, Trump would have standing — or the right to sue — but only if he is charged and “can’t do it in advance.” And Andrew Weissmann, a former FBI general counsel who later worked in special counsel Robert Mueller’s office, also noted that contrary to the Trump team’s claim that the Justice Department was “criminalizing” him, only a grand jury could indict him. “This is how our justice system works,” Weissmann wrote. “This is another PR filing, not a serious one.” Notably, Trump’s team made no mention in Wednesday’s testimony of his weeks-long claim that he had largely declassified all materials seized from Mar-a-Lago, a claim he made on Truth Social just this morning of Wednesday. He also did not address the Justice Department’s most damning claim, made in court testimony Tuesday night: that it had evidence of “possible” efforts to obstruct its investigation into Trump’s handling of national security information. Trump first filed suit last week asking a court-appointed “special master” — usually a former judge — to sift through materials seized in the search and filter out what might be privileged. But the Justice Department said in its response Tuesday that Trump is not entitled to a special master because the files in question “do not belong to him.” The FBI discovered more than two dozen boxes of government records, some of which were classified as top secret, after executing a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago earlier this month. That’s in addition to the 15 boxes of documents Trump turned over in January in response to a request from the National Archives. The department also presented the most detailed description of investigators’ suspicions that Trump and his team misled them when they claimed in a June 3 letter that they had returned all classified files stored at Mar-a-Lago to the government after “diligent research.” The FBI “recovered twice as many redacted documents from the “diligent investigation” that Trump’s lawyer and other representatives “had weeks” to conduct, the Justice Department said in its response to Trump’s lawsuit. This “calls into serious question the statements made in the June 3 certification and calls into question the extent of cooperation in this matter.” Tuesday’s filing by the Justice Department was “devastating and deserved a serious, accurate response,” wrote longtime former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti. But Trump’s response was “large on hyperbole and lacking in law” and appeared to skip over “the most damning details.”